Skip to main content

Detroit Tech: The 1DevDay Event




The 1DevDay event was organized by the Detroit Java User's Group, and held at ePrize in Pleasant Ridge, MI. The event was more like an expanded version of the monthly JUG meetings than something completely new. Since the monthly meetings are both valuable and interesting, this is not a criticism.


Here is a pared-down blow-by-blow of the events that I attended & what I took away from them, straight from what I hammered into OneNote at the time:


9:00 AM - Venkat Subramaniam's Keynote:

  • "Best practices" is often a fallacy.
  • 75% of the features in most systems is used only occasionally. 45% is never used at all. A good argument for Agile?
  • Interesting - Venkat is also making the point that we should pay attention to how we contribute to revenue. (Same as "Passionate Programmer" & other books.) Not sure that I agree that this should be an area of focus - worth some thought to articulate.
  • Don't create a new EJB standard:
    • Innovate first
    • Find real multiple use next
    • Standardize and market last
    • Rails & Spring are two examples.
  • Groovy & Ruby are as strongly typed as Java, they're just not statically typed. You'll get a runtime exception.
  • Check out: http://freerangekids.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/5-dangerous-things-you-should-let-your-kids-do/
  • Bogged down a bit at the end - talked about Unit testing & a lame story about exercise.


I wasn't interested in either of the sessions that followed, so I played around with RSpec while sitting in the Terracotta room.


10:45 AM – 11:45 AM – Agile Teams (Chet Hendrickson)

  • Chet likes burn-up charts over burn-down charts. I see his point.
  • Chet does not like certifications - certainly not for Agile or Scrum.
  • "Metaphor" is an XP practice meaning, "the common language developers and business people speak- the metaphor for the system".
  • 7 big categories (7 pillars of agile):
    • Business Value
    • Confidence - we can prove that the code works / plans are accurate
    • Product - dev should understand the business & product at least somewhat
    • Collaboration
    • Supportive Culture
    • Technical Excellence
    • Self Improvement
  • Check out: http://www.agileskillsproject.com/
  • Ditto on the google group: http://groups.google.com/group/agile-developer-skills
  • The Agile skills matrix, the 7 categories across the top, vertical axis contains:
    • Learner - I've heard of it
    • Journeyman - I can do it on my own & help others
    • Contributor - has changed our collective understanding of this topic

    Where are your skills in each category?

biz val

confidence

collaboration

supt culture

tech ex

self imp

learner

novice

journeyman

master

contributor

  • Developers should read a lot of good code. (Identifying what is "good" is a challenge, but a surmountable one.)
  • Pick up a copy of "Software for your head" by Jim McCarthy.
  • "Move to code as soon as possible."



12:45 PM – 2:45 PM - Ajax / DWR

  • The presenter of this one was a bit new at it and/or I was underprepared. It was difficult to follow along, though I did learn a few things about the capabilities of Dojo and DWR.



2:45 PM – 4:45 PM - OSGi (Dennis O'Flynn)

  • The Mainifest file is the key to this - it contains everything OSGi needs to determine how things fit together.
  • This session helped me form an opinion: It looks really cool, but I can't think of a problem that I would solve using OSGi. I will ignore it unless/until I actually need it.



4:45 PM– 6:45PM – TDD / Refactoring (Nayan Hajratwala)

  • This was without a doubt my favorite.
  • Characterization tests aren't all that tough - write one where parameters have an empty list, zero or null first, take a guess at the result, then change the test to match the result you actually got for the test & get a green one.
  • Nayan likes to run tests on all 3rd party components that you use. Note that these only apply to the methods/components that you're using - not the entire library. Not sure if I agree with this or not. I haven't been bitten by this problem yet, and I don't like to solve problems I don't have...
  • AssertThat sounds very useful. Ex: assertThat(<expected or actual>, is(0));
  • Hamcrest (an anagram for "matcher", I think) has a bunch of different matchers I can use in assertThat(). They're in org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Agile Performance Management: Why Performance Reviews Suck

Many thanks to Mary Poppendieck, who wrote about this topic in 2004, and proposed a comprehensive solution.  She is the inspiration for much of my thinking on this subject.  She is also a better writer than I am a cartoonist.


Performance reviews suck.  I don't know of anyone who goes into their appraisal without some trepidation.  Your boss is guaranteed spring some surprise criticism on you that is ill-informed or misses the point as you see it.  It's a real challenge not to get defensive about that.

The only thing that makes your own performance review suck less is having to give them.  As a manager, I have dished out quite a few, and some of them went pretty badly.  (To the people at my first management job: Thanks for helping me learn how to get better at them.  Your sacrifice was not in vain.)  Since then, receiving one isn't nearly as gut-wrenching, if only because I try to make it easier for the guy on the other side of the desk.  I've been there, and I know how …

Do. Not. Optimize.

You've probably heard this quote before:
Premature optimization is the root of all evil.
 - Tony Hoare
Speculative optimization is always wasted time.  In the absence of an actual performance problem, you're just burning time that could be better spent on refactoring your code to make it clearer.  This is exacerbated because performance-optimized code is usually harder to read than code which hasn't received such treatment.

Here is what you're doing when you optimize:
Adding code that now must be maintained.Obfuscating the existing code.Spending time writing code that doesn't add value. But what's that you say?  You have the experience and know-how to decide when optimization is needed?  Maybe, but probably not.   The people at Sun and Oracle may or may not be smarter than  you or me, but they certainly know more about optimizing Java bytecode than we do.

For example, some people think that having a large number of classes is slower than the alternative.  This …

Developer Skills: Drawing

You aren't a good developer if you can't draw. Fortunately, if you're a human, you can.  Drawing isn't an inborn talent, it's a technical skill that can be learned.  Write the previous sentence on a piece of paper to prove it to yourself.



There.  You just drew a whole bunch of letters quickly and (hopefully) legibly.  Words are a complex set of shapes that need to be drawn in a particular sequence to have meaning.  It's the same basic skill you use when drawing non-character shapes.

Drawing isn't a binary skill that you either have or do not have.  It's a continuum, and even at the shallow end (people with barely-legible handwriting), you have enough of it to communicate ideas visually.

So that changes the top line of this post to:
You aren't a good developer if you don't draw. Visual communication is much more powerful than text.  (This study found 65% retention over 3 days for images vs text.)  We also absorb visual information much faster th…